On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thought....and it's just a thought because I
don't understand how org-mode is implemented....
What if, instead of archiving *moving* subtrees, it left them in
place but *hid* them in a semi-permanent way. By that I mean,
they'd be hidden just like the collapsing org-mode normally does,
but they would never expand, unless a special show-archived-subtrees
variable was non-nil.
this is a very interesting and original idea! I really like it. It
would mean that subitems that are done remain in place, but don't use
space on the screen. I am not sure if I like the term "archiving"
for this. "Locking" seems to be better.