[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ccrtp-devel] Question about ccrtp 1.1.0
From: |
HyoungJu Lee |
Subject: |
Re: [Ccrtp-devel] Question about ccrtp 1.1.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:23:07 +0900 |
Using WinAmp 5.05 and rtp plug (www.live.com), PADDED rtp packet
generated by ccRTP is played well.
Thinks for your advice.
from hjlee.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:02:17 +0200, Federico Montesino Pouzols
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 10:40:19PM +0900, HyoungJu Lee wrote:
> > Sorry for my careless question..^_^
> >
> > Q2 is my misunderstand but, as I posed at Gnu Savannah ccRtp page,
> > I wish to be add a function to padding on/off.
>
> Umm, the rules for setting the padding bit are fixed in the
> standard, if your payload size is not multiple of 4, you have to add
> padding. If you add padding but you do not set the padding bit,
> receivers will think that padding bytes are actual payload. I think
> the best solution is to get chunks of data in multiples of 4 from
> whatever your codec is, that's not usually difficult. Anyway, if
> freeamp does not accept padded packets (as I read in your savannah
> tech. request) it should be reported as a bug.
>
>
>
> >
> > Q1 is...I don't know why periodic packet loss occur...
> > Now, there is no problem.
> >
> > from hjlee.
> >
>