Re: question about a class for list without mark @itemize @w

[Patrice Dumas]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:20:28PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> 
> I think mark-none would be fine.

Ok.

> I saw no-bullet was being used in the current output; that would be okay
> too.  (See below.)

I would prefer to replace it with more semantic classes, but we will
see.

> But it doesn't matter that much as nothing uses these class names.

It does, as we want to make it easy for users to develop their own CSS
styling, and for that there need to be class names, rules about classes
that make them easy to understand and use.

> I don't know how hard it would be but I think it would be nice only
> to output the required CSS in HTML files.

Keeping track of the CSS use is easy as all the CSS should go through
go through html_attribute_class().  Outputting the CSS block after the rest
of the file has been generated can only be done, I think, by holding off
any output before the very end, even when split.  I can try to do it
that way.

Note that a similar issue arises with LaTeX output, the packages needed
depend on the @-commands used, maybe it would be good to the something
similar for the LaTeX output to determine the header at the end.

-- 
Pat