[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option
From: |
Rakesh Pandit |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:22:38 +0530 |
2009/10/5 Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> May you suggest something better then TIMEOUT_UNSPECIFIED ? I cannot
> think of anything more suitable then this.
>
> I don't know why you need that macro, just define the variables to -1.
> Please call the variable timeout, not ping_timeout.
As I mentioned it confuses with private variable timeout in ping_run.
Do you consider it a good option to change that private variable?
--
Rakesh Pandit
https://fedoraproject.org/
freedom, friends, features, first
- [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Rakesh Pandit, 2009/10/03
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/10/04
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Rakesh Pandit, 2009/10/04
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/10/04
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Rakesh Pandit, 2009/10/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/10/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option,
Rakesh Pandit <=
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Rakesh Pandit, 2009/10/06
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/10/06
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Rakesh Pandit, 2009/10/06
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Rakesh Pandit, 2009/10/06
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Rakesh Pandit, 2009/10/06
- Re: [bug-inetutils] [PATCH] ping/ping6 --deadline option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/10/06