[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] route
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] route |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:38:03 -0400 |
> So does my route/backend.c. But the lengths of these files is <30
> lines. Not some 3000+ line monolith as you are suggesting.
Ah, and don't forget that the code that you plan to copy-paste into
one file supports only IPv4, bare minimum sanity checks and a
single kernel. Add multi-protocol support, robust sanity checks and
multiple kernels and you will get something much worse.
Then one can refactor it when that time comes.
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/16
Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
[bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26