[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] route
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] route |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:48:16 -0400 |
Please include the list in the reply.
You sent the message privately to me.
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:08:17 +0530
From: "Debarshi Ray" <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [bug-inetutils] route
>> Checking for the operating system is always the wrong way to do it,
>> any such patch will be automatically rejected.
Inetutils' ifconfig does something similar, and since it was not
rejected, I don't agree with you.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05