[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?
From: |
Alain Magloire |
Subject: |
RE: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:21:44 -0500 |
>
> PS: I'd like to ask our colleagues to share their opinions, too.
>
> That is the point of a mailing list. :-)
>
Sure, if we knew what you guys were talking about.
What generated file? What is different about this one?
IMHO, if generated files can be "regenerated" cleanly I do not see the
purpose of having it in the repository. But there are exceptions, comes to
mind generated files that need a specific version of a tool (for whatever
reason or bug, say we need bison-xxx), generated files rarely ... generated
8-), etc ...
I would not put Makefile.in in cvs unless it was manually maintain.
- RE: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?,
Alain Magloire <=
RE: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?, Alain Magloire, 2006/01/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006/01/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006/01/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Generated files in CVS?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006/01/20