Re: [Bug-gne]various random thoughts

[Hook]

I clearly don't have my thinking head on this morning.  Can I take a step or
two backwards?  What's this process which we're talking about going to be
doing?


> eh?
>
> i meant some sort of ipc would be needed for apache to activate the perl.
>
> if the perl is running in the background, as you suggested,  it needs to
> know when to run and with what data to use.
> therefore a smaller script which was directly run as a cgi (by apache)
> would have to send an IPC call to the perl running in the background,
> to tell it to generate the page etc.
>
> and then we'd need a simple stdout trick to get it to eventually give the
> output back to apache.
>
> At 23:02 28/06/2001 +0800, you wrote:
> >Rob Scott wrote :
> > >
> > > >
> > > >If you don't awnt to pay the price of a perl comp every time a script
> >runs
> > > >(and it's a small price, believe me), then run the thing from inittab
and
> > > >make it sleep between work sessions. Simple and clean. Unless you've
got
> >a
> > > >lot of proggie gurus on tap, you'll need the fast development cycle
of
> >Perl
> > > >to stay ahead of the requirements list. Things can always be
redeveloped
> > > >into a faster language once they're stable.
> > >
> > > yes but running something in the background would require some sort
> > > of IPC which im not sure tom's done yet.
> >
> >For what? Anything which touches the database will use the MySQL client
> >code. It's trivial to use with either C or Perl, so I'm not sure why raw
> >sockets are needed.
> >
> >The Hooker
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Bug-gne mailing list
> >address@hidden
> >http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gne
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gne mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gne
>