[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] Clearing errors?
From: |
Marc Simpson |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] Clearing errors? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:05:24 -0800 |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Thomas Dickey <address@hidden> wrote:
> no... it propagates the error up until it's either ignored with a ~force,
> or to the topmost level. You can see most of that by turning on the
> trace, e.g., with the command-line -D option, or in a macro using
>
> ~trace on
thanks for clarifying.
- [vile] Clearing errors?, Marc Simpson, 2016/03/11
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?, Marc Simpson, 2016/03/11
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?, Marc Simpson, 2016/03/11
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?, Thomas Dickey, 2016/03/11
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?, Marc Simpson, 2016/03/11
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?, Thomas Dickey, 2016/03/11
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?,
Marc Simpson <=
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?, Thomas Dickey, 2016/03/13
- Re: [vile] Clearing errors?, Marc Simpson, 2016/03/15