[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vile] [PATCH] vileperl.rc (Was: Re: Odd vileserv error)
From: |
Brendan O'Dea |
Subject: |
[vile] [PATCH] vileperl.rc (Was: Re: Odd vileserv error) |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:12:55 +1000 |
On 18 April 2015 at 08:25, J. Chris Coppick <address@hidden> wrote:
> In theory, Vileserv will detect if it's already running and do the right
> thing so you MIGHT be able to do without the '~if ¬ &rd
> "$HOME/.vilesock"'...
Indeed, it does do exactly the right thing. Maybe that guy *did* know
what he was on about...
So the test in the example rc file should probably be removed, as it
will prevent Vileserv from recovering when there is an orphaned
socket. The two subsequent require lines are also superfluous to
requirements.
Tom: suggested patch to the example attached.
--bod
patch.txt
Description: Text document
- [vile] [PATCH] vileperl.rc (Was: Re: Odd vileserv error),
Brendan O'Dea <=