|
From: | David Logan |
Subject: | Re: sub_atom fails? |
Date: | Sun, 2 Jul 2017 23:44:46 -0600 |
Well, it doesn’t seem to be sub_atom as far as it goes. I wrote my own left() in order to do the same job, and the new code still fails with atom table full. At this point, I could use some direction as to why this may be happening. I do not see any nesting situation that would cause this. It appears to me that as I backtrack to the repeat clause, it should remove the atoms that are no longer in use.
David Logan
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |