|
From: | Sean Charles |
Subject: | Some advice on a "simple" thing... |
Date: | Wed, 9 Apr 2014 00:02:37 +0100 |
Hello list, I have almost completed a predicate called ‘jread’ which parses a Java .class file into a term that will allow me to create a database of all of the methods, fields, superclass and interfaces for that class and ultimately create a database for a complete “android.jar” file of any required API level. I am, for educational purposes and my own learning, trying to build a system like Hoogle/Hayoo for Android. I do a lot of Android and I wanted to create a sytem I can wire into Emacs/IntelliJ or anything for that matter, a simple HTTP server that can supply a list of methods that have a certain type signature using a si mple query language. Searching by types it very very useful when using Haskell and I wanted to improve my Prolog so I figured why not do something like that in GNU Prolog? I have already started a simple HTTP library in pure GNU Prolog as well but this comes first now. Progress so far is good…if I run it like this from a folder containing the unpacked android.jar file... | ?- jread('javax/net/SocketFactory.class',X). X = javaclass(super('java/lang/Object'),class('javax/net/SocketFactory'),implements([]), methods([method(access_flags(4),name('<init>'),returns('()V'),[attr(9, [0,3,0,1,0,0,0,14,42,183,0,1,187,0,2,89,18,3,183,0,4,191,0,0,0,2,0,10,0,0,0,6,0,1,0,0,0 ,4,0,11,0,0,0,12,0,1,0,0,0,14,0,12,0,13,0,0])]),method(access_flags(41),name(getDefault) ,returns('()Ljavax/net/SocketFactory;'),attr(9,0,3,0,0,0,0,0,10,187,0,2,89,18,3,183,0,4, 191,0,0,0,1,0,10,0,0,0,6,0,1,0,0,0,5])]),method(access_flags(1),name(createSocket), returns('()Ljava/net/Socket;'),[attr(9,0,3,0,1,0,0,0,10,187,0,2,89,18,3,183,0,4,191, 0,0,0,2,0,10,0,0,0,6,0,1,0,0,0,6,0,11,0,0,0,12,0,1,0,0,0,10,0,12,0,13,0,0]), attr(18,0,1,0,19])]),method(access_flags(1025),name(createSocket), returns('(Ljava/lang/String;I)Ljava/net/Socket;'),[attr(18,[0,2,0,19,0,21])]), method(access_flags(1025),name(createSocket), returns('(Ljava/lang/String;ILjava/net/InetAddress;I)Ljava/net/Socket;’), [attr(18,[0,2,0,19,0,21])]),method(access_flags(1025),name(createSocket), returns('(Ljava/net/InetAddress;I)Ljava/net/Socket;’),[attr(18[0,1,0,19])]),method(access_flags(1025),name(createSocket), returns('(Ljava/net/InetAddress;ILjava/net/InetAddress;I)Ljava/net/Socket;'),[attr(18,[0,1,0,19])])])) ? The place I am at now is decoding the bit flags for the class (and eventually the methods etc) into a term. A typical value would be “1057” decimal, 0x421, this contains the flags:
So you can see that 0x421 means “ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_SUPER and ACC_ABSTRACT”. I would like to produce a term something like this: access_flags(public,super,abstract) It’s not that I don’t know how to do it or that I can’t do it but I am not sure what is the *most elegant* way to do it in Prolog! Heaven knows I have written bit shifting loops to test for flags in a dozen languages but not in Prolog. So, there’s the challenge, what is the most elegant way to turn a list of bits into a list of atom terms. Ideally I would make the list of atoms a parameter so that I can reuse it for the other flag based values. Consider the gauntlet thrown! In the meantime I am continuing to research the possibilities for myself. I will of course put it all on GitHub along with my Redis client. I may even create a Redis database with the information! :) Sean. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |