trans-coord/gnun/licenses/po license-list.pot

[Yavor Doganov]

CVSROOT:        /sources/trans-coord
Module name:    trans-coord
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   11/08/12 18:26:13

Modified files:
        gnun/licenses/po: license-list.pot 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/trans-coord/gnun/licenses/po/license-list.pot?cvsroot=trans-coord&r1=1.56&r2=1.57

Patches:
Index: license-list.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/trans-coord/trans-coord/gnun/licenses/po/license-list.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.56
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -b -r1.56 -r1.57
--- license-list.pot    13 Jul 2011 18:26:14 -0000      1.56
+++ license-list.pot    12 Aug 2011 18:26:13 -0000      1.57
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2011-07-13 14:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2011-08-12 14:25-0300\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -1233,9 +1233,9 @@
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
 msgid ""
 "This is a free software license.  By itself, it has a copyleft comparable to "
-"the GPL's.  However, it allows recipients to distribute the work under the "
-"terms of other selected licenses, and some of those&mdash;the <a "
-"href=\"#EPL\">Eclipse Public License</a> and the <a "
+"the GPL's, and incompatible with it.  However, it gives recipients ways to "
+"relicense the work under the terms of other selected licenses, and some of "
+"those&mdash;the <a href=\"#EPL\">Eclipse Public License</a> and the <a "
 "href=\"#CommonPublicLicense10\">Common Public License</a> in "
 "particular&mdash;only provide a weaker copyleft.  Thus, developers can't "
 "rely on this license to provide a strong copyleft."
@@ -1243,11 +1243,18 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
 msgid ""
-"The EUPL is compatible with GPLv2, because that is listed as one of the "
-"alternative licenses that recipients may use.  However, it is incompatible "
-"with GPLv3, because recipients are not given permission to use GPLv3's "
-"terms, and the EUPL's copyleft conflicts with GPLv3's.  Because of this "
-"incompatibility, we urge you not to use the EUPL for any software you write."
+"The EUPL allows relicensing to GPLv2, because that is listed as one of the "
+"alternative licenses that users may convert to.  It also, indirectly, allows "
+"relicensing to GPL version 3, because there is a way to relicense to the "
+"CeCILL v2, and the CeCILL v2 gives a way to relicense to any version of the "
+"GNU GPL.  To do this two-step relicensing, you need to first write a piece "
+"of code which you can license under the CeCILL v2, or find a suitable module "
+"already available that way, and add it to the program.  Adding that code to "
+"the EUPL-covered program provides grounds relicense it to the CeCILL v2.  "
+"Then your need to write a piece of code which you can license under the GPL "
+"v3+, or find a suitable module already available that way, and add it to the "
+"program.  Adding that code to the CeCILL-covered program provides grounds to "
+"relicense it to GPL v3+."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
@@ -2514,10 +2521,11 @@
 "Creative Commons publishes many licenses which are very different.  "
 "Therefore, to say that a work &ldquo;uses a Creative Commons license&rdquo; "
 "is to leave the principal questions about the work's licensing unanswered.  "
-"When you see such a statement in a work, please ask the author to highlight "
-"the substance of the license choices.  And if someone proposes to &ldquo;use "
-"a Creative Commons license&rdquo; for a certain work, it is vital to ask "
-"immediately, &ldquo;Which one?&rdquo;"
+"When you see such a statement in a work, please ask the author to change the "
+"work to state clearly and visibly <em>which</em>of the Creative Commons "
+"license it uses.  And if someone proposes to &ldquo;use a Creative Commons "
+"license&rdquo; for a certain work, it is vital to ask &ldquo;Which Creative "
+"Commons license?&rdquo; before proceeding any further."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>