trans-coord-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/po not-ipr.pot


From: Yavor Doganov
Subject: trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/po not-ipr.pot
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:25:11 +0000

CVSROOT:        /sources/trans-coord
Module name:    trans-coord
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   10/05/26 18:25:11

Modified files:
        gnun/philosophy/po: not-ipr.pot 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pot?cvsroot=trans-coord&r1=1.5&r2=1.6

Patches:
Index: not-ipr.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/trans-coord/trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- not-ipr.pot 18 Dec 2009 19:25:16 -0000      1.5
+++ not-ipr.pot 26 May 2010 18:25:11 -0000      1.6
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2009-12-18 14:25-0500\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-05-26 14:25-0300\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -33,10 +33,11 @@
 msgid ""
 "It has become fashionable to toss copyright, patents, and "
 "trademarks&mdash;three separate and different entities involving three "
-"separate and different sets of laws&mdash;into one pot and call it "
-"&ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;.  The distorting and confusing term did "
-"not arise by accident.  Companies that gain from the confusion promoted it.  "
-"The clearest way out of the confusion is to reject the term entirely."
+"separate and different sets of laws&mdash;plus a dozen other laws into one "
+"pot and call it &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;.  The distorting and "
+"confusing term did not become common by accident.  Companies that gain from "
+"the confusion promoted it.  The clearest way out of the confusion is to "
+"reject the term entirely."
 msgstr ""
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
@@ -157,8 +158,9 @@
 msgid ""
 "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
 "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law.  That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law.  The term &ldquo;intellectual "
-"property&rdquo; led that professor to make false generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others.  The term "
+"&ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; led that professor to make false "
+"generalization."
 msgstr ""
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
@@ -215,11 +217,12 @@
 # type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or "
-"copyrights, or trademarks, the first step is to forget the idea of lumping "
-"them together, and treat them as separate topics.  The second step is to "
-"reject the narrow perspectives and simplistic picture the term "
-"&ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; suggests.  Consider each of these issues "
-"separately, in its fullness, and you have a chance of considering them well."
+"copyrights, or trademarks, or various other different laws, the first step "
+"is to forget the idea of lumping them together, and treat them as separate "
+"topics.  The second step is to reject the narrow perspectives and simplistic "
+"picture the term &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; suggests.  Consider "
+"each of these issues separately, in its fullness, and you have a chance of "
+"considering them well."
 msgstr ""
 
 # type: Content of: <p>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]