[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fusermount vs fusermount3
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: fusermount vs fusermount3 |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:14:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stephen Gildea <stepheng+emacs@gildea.com> writes:
Hi Stephen,
> Using fusermount worked for me. I gave it the same arguments
> tramp-fuse would have used with fusermount3:
>
> fusermount -u /tmp/tramp.sshfs.remotehost
>
> I tested this on Ubuntu 20.04, which has fuse package 2.9.9-3.
Yep, it is just the difference between FUSE2 and FUSE3:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# fusermount --version
fusermount version: 2.9.9
# fusermount3 --version
fusermount3 version: 3.10.4
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I've implemented this just now:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun tramp-fuse-get-fusermount ()
"Determine the local `fusermount' command."
;; We use key nil for local connection properties.
(with-tramp-connection-property nil "fusermount"
(or (executable-find "fusermount3")
(executable-find "fusermount"))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Will push it when the rest is finished.
Best regards, Michael.
- Re: new file is not seen as remote, (continued)
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Stephen Gildea, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Stephen Gildea, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/04
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Stephen Gildea, 2021/10/04
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/05
fusermount vs fusermount3, Stephen Gildea, 2021/10/02
- Re: fusermount vs fusermount3,
Michael Albinus <=