On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Simo Melenius
<address@hidden> wrote:
2009/4/23 Michael Albinus <address@hidden>:
> Oops, yes. Sounds OK to me. "[a-zA-Z0-9.]+" would be better (who wants a
> backslash in a domain name?).
My mistake, a plain dot is exactly what I meant. Maybe a dash could be
included as well, making it "[-a-zA-Z0-9.]+" ?
> It would be more complex. It should be at least "[^%@:]+" for GNU Emacs,
> and "address@hidden" for XEmacs. Therefore, I prefer the first alternative.
Something like this is what I anticipated :-)
thanks,
S
--
() Today is the car of the cdr of your life.
/\
http://arc.pasp.de/
_______________________________________________