tlf-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tlf-devel] WARC bands


From: Ed
Subject: Re: [Tlf-devel] WARC bands
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:47:33 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 02/25/2014 02:57 PM, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
Hello all,

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:36:11PM +0200, Zilvinas, AUGMA wrote:
Greetings all,

I run tlf in qso mode also for everyday logging. I see the software
doesn't show WARC bands in "Worked" window.

so, that's true, everyone can reproduce,

The bandmap is also affected - I just made a qso with station and it
does note become "lower case".

then Thomas wrote, he will fix that soon,

I do understand that the all the focus and efforts are concentrated
is made on contesting...
Are there any chances to get these bands 'recognised' in tlf ?
BTW bandswitching via hamlib is working OK.

I've reviewed the code, and looks like it could be fixed too.

But I don't know, what would be the best solution:

i) in QSO mode, Tlf shows all band in "Worked" window, that means
instead of the current 6 band there would be 9. Then the bottom
line of Worked window would be directly abaove the current QSO
line. Of course in CONTEST mode, the WARC bands would be hidden.

Disadvantage of this solution is the Worked window would be too
high, and - may be - unconfortable.

ii) there is no different between QSO and CONTEST mode, but if
there is one or more match in QSO list on WARC band, that would
be showed, and then the next band would be hidden. For example,
if you have a QSO on 30m, and matches one or more criteria (zone,
country or callsign match), then it seems the 20m or 40m of site.
That depends, which other band have matches.

And that's the disadvantage of this solution: what if if you have
a QSO on 20, 30 and 40 meters? What would be showed?

I prefer the first case, but I don't want to decide alone in this
question.

I hope the situation is clear to all, and can help to decide :)


73,

Ervin
HA2OS



I also would prefer the first case.

Ed W3NR











reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]