|
From: | Michael Matz |
Subject: | Re: [Tinycc-devel] standalone backtraces |
Date: | Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:02:47 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) |
Hi, On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, grischka wrote:
Herman ten Brugge wrote:I need only 1. I modified the code. See attached patch.I don't think so. Basically, in tinycc, before you add new code, always try if you can solve the problem by just removing old code first. (Also, please don't make changes to existing code without any comments, unless really obvious for everybody). Anyway, should work now. See https://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/d79e1deeBtw, there seems to be a bug in the sym-version code that crashes tcc when it tries to link with a .so, for example: echo "void f() {}" | tcc - -shared -o a.so echo "main() {}" | tcc - a.so <segmentation fault>I cannot reproduce this. I checkout a fresh copy and see no problem. I use Fedora 31 with all updates.
see for example https://gitlab.com/giomasce/tinycc/-/jobs/408014593 +./a.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ./a1.so: unsupported version 25960 of Verneed record
Fixed in https://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/fdeeb62Also the stack usage for nested expressions you noted in the d79e1dee commit might be be a bit smaller now, I've reworked the expression parser to be a precedence parser for the easy cases, so there's now only one recursion level per higher precedence operator. Of course it's still possible to write expression that need unbounded recursion depth.
Ciao, Michael.
--- grischkaRegards, Herman_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |