[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tftb-help] Urgent Help needed on wavelet (fwd)
From: |
Eric Chassande-Mottin |
Subject: |
Re: [Tftb-help] Urgent Help needed on wavelet (fwd) |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:23:28 +0200 (CEST) |
Thanks for your prompt reply. I have some ideas on what you are talking
about and I started agree with you. I have re-read the source that I
have got, and I realise that the "tau" is defined as the time scale in
his defintion, which I think is different than "a" in euqation 1 which
equals to "fo/f" or "f/fo", and thus results a different
multi-resolution features.
Ok, I understand your point, now. I was wrong yesterday when I said that
tfrrmsc computes exactly W(tau,omega). tfrrmsc computes a time-scale
representation (t,a) like in the Eq (1) of your previous message.
you want a 1/scale-frequency representation.
I have tried to compute my work using tfrrmsc, and it results a good
time resolution at high frequency region, and poor time resolution when
frequency is low.
Another question is, is there anyway for me to compute the
multi-resolution properties like what the paper describe? Do I need to
go into the m file and change it?
yes, you'll have to. I would extract from tfrrmsc.m the part of the code
which calculates tfr and adapt the loops so that you implement Eq (3).
W(tau,omega) = (tau^-0.5) x Integrate [f(t) x h(t/tau) x exp(j*omega*tau)] dt
(3)
eric.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Tftb-help] Urgent Help needed on wavelet (fwd),
Eric Chassande-Mottin <=