Re: [Texmacs-dev] Suggestions to release GNU TeXmacs 1.99.12

[Alvaro Tejero Cantero]

Is the process to build the .deb package for ubuntu from a fresh release in svn/git automated?

These binary packages have become indispensable for me as I had problems building TeXmacs + Guile last time I tried.

Álvaro.

On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 21:54, TeXmacs <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Darcy,

We sure can discuss how to improve the release cycle.

But it is not possible to fix every single bug before
releasing a new version.  We can use fix part of them and
fix more of them in a subsequent version.

I agree that we should do more testing before releases as well.
Denis systematically runs a series of tests before every new version,
but we could extend the tests both in number and in quality.

Best wishes, --Joris


On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 05:58:04PM +0800, Darcy Shen via Texmacs-dev wrote:
> For the Scala Project, developers will write a detailed release issue:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/649
>
>
>
> I think it is a good practice to write an open issue(ticket???for the release process.
>
>
>
> We just write done things we have to do before the release and after the release.
>
>
>
> For example, before the release, we should check the usability of basic functionalities of GNU TeXmacs???
>
> 1. Copy and Paste (Unicode)
>
> 2. Search and Replace (Unicode)
>
> 3. Import of various image formats (png, jpg)
>
> 4. ......
>
>
>
> After the release, we may write a detailed release note and advertise GNU TeXmacs somewhere on the internet.
>
>
>
> And also, it would be nice to use release candidates, when release candidates are released, only bug fixes are allowed.

> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev


_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev