[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pod2texi doc?
|
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
|
Subject: |
Re: pod2texi doc? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:50:56 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:32:15PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> I think because it is not installed in the default case because it
> depends on Pod::Simple::PullParser.
>
> I ran a test install before I sent my message. And pod2texi was
> installed -- because I have PullParser.pm, evidently :). But the point
Nope, because it is in fact always installed. It is nodist and not
noinst as I thought.
> is that I didn't have to do anything special in Texinfo to enable it
> being installed, so it will be installed for some people, so it should
> be in the manual.
It will be installed for all people...
> Maybe we should add --enable-pod2texi=yes|no|detected to configure
> (default detected, as it is now).
In that case I think it should simply replace perl-api-texi-build, as
it would be rather redundant. I agree that the installation may be
skipped if not detected and not 'yes'.
Should I do that change?
> Yeah. Man pages, yes, sounds good. I don't think the pod2texi output
> will fit well as part of the Texinfo manual, and a whole separate .texi
> for it seems like overkill, but anyway, I'll mess around with it and get
> back.
Ok.
--
Pat