[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cust.vars in manual vs. code
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: cust.vars in manual vs. code |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:33:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:19:10PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> This is done, in util/txicustomvars.
>
> So I wrote the little doc/refcard/txivarcheck to compare the list of
> cust.vars implemented vs. documented.
>
> Should any of these be added to the manual, or removed from the code?
> (Any that remain can be just excluded from the comparison as a special
> case.)
I have filtered out the variables that are already documented in the
Parser.pm file and should not, in my opinion, be documented in the
manual.
I also removed the variables that are hashes or arrays that should be
documented in the API documentation, maybe, but not in the manual.
We're down to:
tp only 10: DEFAULT_ENCODING ENCODING_NAME IGNORE_PREAMBLE_TEXT
IN_ENCODING SILENT SPLIT_INDEX TOP_NODE_UP_URL TRANSLITERATE_FILE_NAMES
documentdescription setfilename
I'll have a more precise look.
--
Pat