[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: makeinfo --version
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: makeinfo --version |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:47:21 -0800 |
Sigh. I guess I wasn't clear.
That won't really solve the problem, as it is not automatically set
from configure.
I know.
unconvinced that it is correct to synchronize perl modules versions
and texinfo version,
Sure. I remember that previous discussion. I'm not arguing (here) that
that should be done. (I see no harm in doing so, and in fact I think it
would minimize confusion, but it's a different issue.)
and in addition this forces to have something like
Texinfo/Parser.pm.in that becomes Texinfo/Parser.pm and I'd prefer
to avoid that if possible.
I fully agree. Already too much generation going on.
I also don't think that we should module versions be 5.0 on release,
Yes, I remember that too. I didn't really care then, but now the 0.01
is causing a practical problem. Is there some reason I'm missing why
0.01 is actively *preferable* to 4.99/5.0?
My thought is simply to change
$VERSION = '0.01';
to
$VERSION = '4.99';
in *.pm. Or 5.0 if you prefer, whatever.
This eliminates the (very real) problem with redhat configure, while not
requiring Yet Another generated version of texi2any. It's just a
number, so Why not choose a number that eliminates the hassle?
Thanks,
karl