[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc. |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 00:32:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:31:50PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> So, matching { and } are to accepted, I think. But non matching (in
> the block version, in @inlineraw, they have to be matching)?
>
> Why should they have to be matching? I don't think that should be required.
>
> As for @inlineraw, in TeX, using bare braces doesn't work at all, people
> have to use @[lr]bracechar. So whatever behavior you want to implement
> there is fine, people won't be able to count on anything in particular.
Bare braces, indeed, but TeX commands have to be passed as is, and for
texi2any, a TeX command is nothing else than simple text. Besides,
matching bare braces in general work in TeX and delimitate blocks? Or
I am missing something? Anyway, in
@inlineraw{tex, $--{x^i}\over{\tan y}$}
matching braces should be accepted in my opinion.
So, I'll make all matching braces be accepted (in all the formats).
--
Pat