Re: proposals for new XML

[Patrice Dumas]

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:52:34PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> 
> Would it be more helpful to give the actual argument as the commandarg=
> value, whatever it is?  Thus, for the two examples in your mail:
> <itemize commandarg="@minus">

Ok.

> <itemize commandarg="+">
> 
> Got it.  Good.

So no commandarg for +, ok?

>     It could be possible to have something more consistent with that tree
>     in xml, along ... Would you prefer that?
> 
> Yes.  It seems much better in the long run.  Should we change @itemize's
> XML output too?

The parsed tree is already like I presented, I am actually asking whether
the Texinfo XML should conform to that tree too...  So I guess this is 
a yes :-)

-- 
Pat