[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Taler] crypto breakage
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Taler] crypto breakage |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:20:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 12/10/19 11:39 AM, ng0 wrote:
>> Please be aware that Git master is thus henceforth INCOMPATIBLE with
>> the 0.11.x GNUnet network, and interactions between old and new peers
>> will result in signature verification failures. 0.11.x peers will NOT
>> be able to communicate with Git master or 0.12.x peers. There could be
>> further last-minute protocol changes, so if you have any that are ready
>> to go in, this week is your merge window.
>
> Since you branched "0.11" in git, does that mean there could be
> backported fixes, or do we simply keep the branch as a point of
> reference for the 0.11 gnunet cut?
Yes.
> I know that it makes no sense to maintain 0.11 and 0.12.x+, but
> I'm just interested in what the branch was for.
>
Both, as needed, even though I doubt much if anything will be backported.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature