[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Taler] repurchase detection
From: |
Jeff Burdges |
Subject: |
Re: [Taler] repurchase detection |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:42:11 +0100 |
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 16:13 +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> > Should we use the hostname of the fulfillment URL? The hostname of
> the
> > site that offered the contract (with taler-confirm-contract) in the
> > first place? What if the merchant's hostname changes?
>
> It's much simpler. The contract proposals are signed by the
> merchant's
> public key, so just include the merchant's public key.
We might need the hostname as well, I think.
We've reasonable measures against abusing repurchase detection for
tracking, but one should always avoid spreading data between hostnames.
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part