[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu soc status
From: |
Bean |
Subject: |
Re: gnu soc status |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:25:06 +0800 |
Hi,
Yeah, I'm willing to mentor phcoder on this one.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:21 AM, phcoder <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello. Unfortunately the first email was seen by gmail as spam. Yes, I
> already contribute to grub2 and today I submitted a big patch on which I was
> working already quite a some time. From the two projects I submitted
> application to I personally prefer TCP/IP which in my opinion is also higher
> in priority (I detailed the uses in my application). Also even if grub2 is
> supposed to be a replacement of grub1, grub2 lacks networking altogether
> (except in some contexts where it can rely on an external implementation of
> networking interface).
>>
>> In case that there is now an additional slot to be filled that has not
>> yet been promised to another GNU subprojct, I would now undo my previous
>> statment and instead support this GRUB2 project (given the new input I
>> got today).
>
> Thank you for your support of grub2.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
>
--
Bean
- Re: my annual complaint, (continued)
- Re: gnu soc status, Tom Tromey, 2009/04/11
- Re: gnu soc status, Sam Steingold, 2009/04/12
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/12
- Re: gnu soc status, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, phcoder, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status,
Bean <=