Speech Dispatcher Java Bindings

[Chris Brannon]

Tomas Cerha wrote:
> There are probably more.  We currently incline to the belief that having
> all bindings in the common source tree is better, especially because of
> lower maintenance overhead.  Thus we would be for inclusion of the Java
> binding in the speechd repository.  Other option would be to separate
> all client libraries into separate repos with their own independent
> comitters/maintainers, release cycle, version numbers etc.

The biggest advantage of keeping them separate is that releases of client
libraries could be made as needed, even if there were no reason to release
a new version of Speech Dispatcher.