spam-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Spam-discuss] Buried


From: Luis Miguel Arteaga
Subject: Re: [Spam-discuss] Buried
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 18:48:47 +0100

     Paul Fisher  wrote:
     > On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 11:35:06PM +0100, Ward Vandewege wrote:
     > > You are most likely not filtering out the spam on your end.
     > > The GNU setup only tags spam messages with several header
     > > lines starting with X-Spam. It does not block any message
     > > from reaching you.
     >
     > This is how our anti-spam system is seutp.  Luis, are you not
     > receiving X-Spam headers on the emails you receive?

I did not know that those X-spam header were being sent already. I 
don't look at them normally. 

Now I am filtering those headers and reduced the spam to four or five 
messages per day. It's much better but not yet ideal. 

Anyhow, I am downloading all the messages on a costly internet 
connection. Why don't we just delete messages with certain spam level 
and above? Is there a problem with that?

Thanks to all who sent answers to my original message and specially 
to those who are working on this. 

/luis


-- 
-------------------------------------
Luis M. Arteaga 
http://www.geocities.com/larteaga




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]