[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Social-mediagoblin] New official git/contribution workflow docs

From: Christopher Allan Webber
Subject: Re: [Social-mediagoblin] New official git/contribution workflow docs
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:33:09 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)

I've made a small change to the workflow, suggesting that feature
branches contain both the issue number and the feature type.


This is a lot more verbose, and you *can* just use the description or
the bug number (I'd prefer the description if you're going to do one or
the other), but if it's not too much trouble for you, it makes it easier
for me to manage if you can do both.

Does that work for everyone?

 - Chris

Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all!
> Will Kahn-Greene, our emperor of documentation, has written a wonderful
> new section in the docs detailing the preferred way to handle pushing up
> contributions via git.
> Basically, we're encouraging feature branches (and as a fallback,
> accepting patches, hopefully via git format-patch).  Feature branches
> are easier for us to merge and keep things nice and clean and easier for
> you to maintain probably also.
> Is this clear?  If you have any questions or suggestions for doc
> modifications, let us know.  And as always, feel free to discuss on IRC.
> Thanks again, Will!  And thanks again to all of you in the lovely
> community of contributors we're brewing here! :)
>  - Chris

The bottom line.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]