Re: [Social-mediagoblin] Templates, CSS, Images, JS, licensing

[Matt Lee]

On 04/13/2011 07:29 PM, Rob Myers rob-at-robmyers.org |cnuk.org/cnuk/ff|
wrote:
> On 14/04/11 00:21, Matt Lee wrote:
>>
>> I think the template code should be under the LGPL v3.
> 
> Please could you explain the reasoning behind these specific choices? I
> don't mean that I agree or disagree with them, just that I'd like to
> understand them better.

Sure.

For JavaScript -- GPL is a fine license. AGPL isn't needed and we
shouldn't apply it without thinking about why we need it.

For templates -- LGPL is a permissive license that's also upwardly
compatible with GPL and thus AGPL... I suppose another permissive
license would also be okay too.

-- 

Sent from my computer

Are you my close, personal friend? http://matt.lee.name/cpfom/

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature