[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The state of peer connectivity
From: |
Andreas Puls |
Subject: |
Re: The state of peer connectivity |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jan 2020 10:49:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 |
Happy New Year !
Am 31.12.2019 um 18:47 schrieb Todd Fleisher:
> Is this the one you are
> remembering: https://github.com/Timi7007/SKS-Keyserver-Gossip-Network-Graph ?
>
Yes! That's it. Thank you - i've set a bookmark now :)
> -T
>
Br
Andreas
>> On Dec 31, 2019, at 6:58 AM, Andreas Puls <address@hidden
>> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Skip,
>>
>> nice work.
>>
>> I remember that another User wrote a JavaScript? and HTML where all
>> servers are listed with their peering. Unfortunately i can't find the
>> link anymore :(
>>
>> Br
>> Andreas
>>
>> Am 20.12.2019 um 18:55 schrieb Skip Carter:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Following the loss of half my peers last week (thank you to all that
>>> added me afterwards). I wondered just what the state of peer
>>> connectivity was. So I wrote an application to find out.
>>>
>>> I started with the servers currently in the pool from
>>> https://sks-keyservers.net/status/
>>>
>>> Then queried each active server in turn with /pks/lookup?op=stats
>>>
>>> I ended up with the attached diagram.
>>>
>>> There were 34 active servers. The average number of peers per server
>>> is 12. But there are a handful of servers with only 1 or 2 peers. I
>>> did not find any islands.
>>> (I ignored the peers with RFC 1918 addresses and servers that did not
>>> respond when I made the measurements).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: The state of peer connectivity,
Andreas Puls <=