Re: [Sks-devel] Unde(r)served HKPS [was: Underserved areas?]

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

On 01/14/2018 08:46 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> From a privacy perspective, then yes, using HKPS transport is better,
> but it doesn't improve anything if malicious servers are included in
> some way that records information anyways, so having all servers
> included reduces privacy, it doesn't improve anything, as long as the
> pool itself is operational.

I should add here that same goes for the Tor OnionBalance service.

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
"If you are successful, you may win false friends and true enemies.
Succeed anyway."
(Mother Teresa)

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature