[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] IPv4 vs. IPv6? -- Reconciliation attempt from unauthoriz
|
From: |
Daniel Kahn Gillmor |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] IPv4 vs. IPv6? -- Reconciliation attempt from unauthorized host, but host is authorized |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:48:13 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.0 |
On 12/03/2013 12:34 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> IMO, SKS should either set v6only on the accepting sockets explicitly,
> or remove the defaults and treat :: and 0.0.0.0 as a configuration
> error, since the status quo uses inconsistent logic to defend its
> stance.
I like these suggestions. Thanks for the in-depth response and the link
to itojun's draft.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Sks-devel] IPv4 vs. IPv6? -- Reconciliation attempt from unauthorized host, but host is authorized, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2013/12/02
- Re: [Sks-devel] IPv4 vs. IPv6? -- Reconciliation attempt from unauthorized host, but host is authorized, Karl Schmitz, 2013/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] IPv4 vs. IPv6? -- Reconciliation attempt from unauthorized host, but host is authorized, Kim Minh Kaplan, 2013/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] IPv4 vs. IPv6? -- Reconciliation attempt from unauthorized host, but host is authorized, Phil Pennock, 2013/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] IPv4 vs. IPv6? -- Reconciliation attempt from unauthorized host, but host is authorized, John Clizbe, 2013/12/03