Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?

[David Benfell]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert,

This isn't seeming consistent to me. How do you reconcile...

On 06/04/12 13:39, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> 
> I've only ever said that the keyservers have always been guided by
> a "no loss of information, ever" policy.

with

> And I've also outright said that we need a way to change this
> policy, because otherwise we're one [insert legal challenge] away
> from all of us having to shut down permanently or else fear
> criminal charges for [criminal offense or EU data privacy 
> directive].
> 
???

- -- 
David Benfell
address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=R/nB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----