[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c cont
From: |
John Clizbe |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2012 00:58:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.20pre) Gecko/20110606 Mnenhy/0.8.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.15pre |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
>> The easiest solution would be to auto-expire keys after a fixed time
>> (a good strategy anyway from a security perspective).
>
> What about deleting expired signatures from keys?
&option=clean in my earlier email
- -John
- --
John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net
SKS/Enigmail/PGP-EKP or: John ( @ ) Enigmail DAWT net
FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:address@hidden
Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12-git-509fe4ce-2012-01-31 (Windows XP)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
Comment: Be part of the £7 ECHELON -- Use Strong Encryption.
Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being.
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=
=TZJ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Gabor Kiss, 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Robert J. Hansen, 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Gabor Kiss, 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Robert J. Hansen, 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Kiss Gabor (Bitman), 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Robert J. Hansen, 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Kiss Gabor (Bitman), 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?,
John Clizbe <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?, Yaron Minsky, 2012/05/31