[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy
From: |
Daniel Kahn Gillmor |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 01:04:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120329 Icedove/10.0.3 |
On 04/28/2012 09:39 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> 1.1.1? If doing an update, why not go to 1.1.3, rather than add a patch or two
> to 1.1.1?
>
> 1.1.1 also has the broken HTML generation in it which was fixed for 1.1.2.
I understand there are several changes worth importing, and i agree that
the right long-term thing for debian testing and unstable is to move to
1.1.3; However, i'm not the sks maintainer within debian, and i don't
have the time to learn enough to sort out the full upgrade right now, or
to responsibly commit to becoming the sks maintainer.
I NMU'ed this specific change because it seemed like it was blocking
people's transition to a reverse-proxy setup and it was clearly not
going to break anything else.
Sorry i haven't done more,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Jeffrey Johnson, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Jeffrey Johnson, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Jeffrey Johnson, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Sks-devel] New Server, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/04/28
[Sks-devel] RFE for sks-keyservers.net (was Re: New Server), Jeffrey Johnson, 2012/04/28