Re: [Sks-devel] SKS debian package

[Jeffrey Johnson]

On Apr 21, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Andy Ruddock wrote:

> 
> That's my interpretation. So a backport of sks to stable would also
> require a backport of libdb5.3, yes? (It's good that multiple versions
> of the Berkeley DB can coexist).
> 

There is another (but likely minority/contrarian opinion)

        Multiple coexisting solutions of nearly identical functionality
        is simply B-L-O-A-T.

And the recommended -- by SleepyCat -- solution is to internalize
Berkeley DB to avoid breakage between different applications
compiled against different libraries.

But I don't use Debian … do as you wish.

73 de Jeff