screen-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [screen-devel] Screen caused buffer owerflow?


From: Axel Beckert
Subject: Re: [screen-devel] Screen caused buffer owerflow?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:28:24 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi Josef,

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:47:56AM -0400, Josef Ridky wrote:
> I have been requested to solve following problem with screen, but I am 
> confuse, because, I am not able to reproduce it anyhow.
> For more information see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350549.
> 
> Can anyone help me, how to solve this? Where can be the issue?

Works fine for me with 4.4.0-4 on Debian Unstable, too.

What is strange and confusing in that bug report is that the original
reporter says he got the error message "terminal name too long. (max.
20 char)". But at least Screen 4.4.0 has MAXTERMLEN set to 32 in os.h.
(So unless Fedora patches that value as we do in Debian for backwards
compatibility, it's not Screen 4.4.0 issuing that error message.)

So for me it's likely that the issue is in an older version of screen.
The original reporter also wrote something about a pending upgrade. So
I assume that the version number in the report is moot.

About the crash, my only idea is that this might be related to using
new client with old server process or similar as they might use
different values for some of these constants. But I'm not sure at all
if that can cause such a crash as I mostly experienced hanging (but
still living) clients or some features (e.g. window resizing) not
working when client and server have different versions.

                Kind regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <address@hidden>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]