savannah-register-public
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-register-public] Re: [task #10776] Submission of SeNTX


From: Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
Subject: [Savannah-register-public] Re: [task #10776] Submission of SeNTX
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:19:49 -0600

I did answered you, didn't you received this?:

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Mario Castelán Castro
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Update of task #10776 (project administration):
>>
>>                  Status:                    None => In Progress
>>             Assigned to:                    None => marioxcc
>>
>>    _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Follow-up Comment #1:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> 2010-11-20 in GNU Savannah task #10776: "Submission of SeNTX".
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm evaluating the project you submitted for approval in GNU Savannah.
>> You can reach the rest Savannah hackers (Staff) in this list:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers-public.
>>
>> You have provided a description of a free software users community;
>> I'm very glad to see more free software supporters in México.
>> However, you selected non-GNU software & documentation in the "Type"
>> field, sent a tarball named "semece-current" and provided "SeNTX" as
>> project name.  Do you meant to host semece as software, or provide a
>> space for SeNTX in GNU Savannah?.
>>
>
> Well we, SeNTX, need a space for discussion, we also develop some
> software (semece is one of them, I put that tarball because the registration
> form needed to have one), all under ISC License.
>
>> Note that we host both GuGs and software/documentation, but as
>> separate projects.
>
> Since currently we are only on the need of a mailing list should I
> describe us as a 'GuG'?, I mean, we don't need Savannah for any of our
> software repositories...
>
>> Anyway, you might want to take a look at
>> https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly.
>
> Already read (but I read it now anyway)...
>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> "Content" is in our list of words to avoid or use with care.  There is
>> a note specific to "content management" in
>> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html:
>>
>>  The term "content management" takes the prize for vacuity.
>>  "Content" means "some sort of information," and "management" in this
>>  context means "doing something with it." So a "content management
>>  system" is a system for doing something to some sort of
>>  information. Nearly all programs fit that description.
>>
>>  In most cases, that term really refers to a system for updating
>>  pages on a web site. For that, we recommend the term "web site
>>  revision system" (WRS).
>>
>
> Ok, I was referring to a "Web Site Revision System".
>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Item status changes:
>>
>> Assigned to -> marioxcc
>> Status -> In progress
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEAREIAAYFAkzoWVkACgkQZ4DA0TLic4j0tACfVhEedwggeIxVRNWz0jBeYura
>> h40An1ImikaVi6I1eL3g/6O8hhQ9fVCC
>> =xK2Q
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>    _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Reply to this item at:
>>
>>  <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10776>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Mensaje enviado vía/por Savannah
>>  http://savannah.gnu.org/
>>
>>
>
> Thank you.
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]