[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-register-public] [task #10714] Submission of kaso verb conjuga
From: |
Mario Castelán Castro |
Subject: |
[Savannah-register-public] [task #10714] Submission of kaso verb conjugation system |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:14:55 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-AR; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010072022 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3) |
Follow-up Comment #4, task #10714 (project administration):
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
2010-10-24 in GNU Savannah task #10714: "Submission of kaso verb
conjugation system".
> So, does changing it from ISC to something else that is permissive
> really matter? Let me know your thoughts, and I would be happy to
> reconsider.
The possible problem with the ISC license is it may be interpreted as
being nonfree because of it wording, as explained in
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ISC.
The document you referred seems to talk about permissive licenses in
general without specific bias towards the ISC license or something
else. Is there a particular reason because you chose the ISC license
instead of another permissive license?.
I'm asking you to change to a similar, but clearly worded license just
to avoid unlikley but still possible misunderstanding according to the
GNU page comment about the ISC license.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREIAAYFAkzHmLsACgkQZ4DA0TLic4honACfa4MBdkmMEBFifbkXivf6FPmr
eHsAn23m7lFhwDdQiLbGVvi4ArdKWODS
=jD86
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10714>
_______________________________________________
Mensaje enviado vía/por Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/