savannah-register-public
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-register-public] [task #9908] Submission of ClipGrab


From: Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro
Subject: [Savannah-register-public] [task #9908] Submission of ClipGrab
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:19:27 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-AR; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009102814 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3)

Follow-up Comment #6, task #9908 (project administration):

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

November 11th 2009 in GNU Savannah item 9908: "Submission of ClipGrab"

Do you mean require modified versions to delete the logo?

I think than a program can be considered free even if you require than
the logos are changed or removed for modified versions since the logo
is not an functional part but is like a signature, is not unehtical if
only you can use your signature.

Anyway that requirement makes distribucion of modificated version very
annoying.

- From my viewpoint, require modified versions to remove logos it is a
technical problem rather than a ethical one. Any other restriction
about the logo will be unethical too.

To enable everybody modify and redistribute modified versions of you
program easily licence logos so they arecompatible with GPL. I have
dobut if GPL can be use with images since there is no clear point
between source code and object code in this case.

Wath administrators think?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkr6nWwACgkQZ4DA0TLic4hqPgCfZiywv7DQ0seyUwCoSUeYmq9l
Cr8AnRKmFFJf2OwSww68LPZcPLDdRdxr
=kpUY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9908>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]