[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #8645] Submission of Freeciv Web Cl
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #8645] Submission of Freeciv Web Client |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:36:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 05:13:45PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
> I'm not sure about the license compatibility either; maybe you could
> ask address@hidden if the application server falls under the GPL's
> "compiler exception" like Java in this case?
>
> Please don't ask address@hidden first -- that queue is worse off than
> savannah's. And this is a complicated situation, not easy to
> understand.
Btw, is there a way to make Savannah requests somewhat more
prioritary? The reason is that Savannah acts as a proxy for
address@hidden during project approvals.
As for the issue at hand, I would be surprised if licensing@ didn't
have an answer. J2EE application servers are a pretty standard way to
host Java applications for the web, through a defined API, although
they share the same user-space. This is much like running a script on
Apache+PHP, so I don't think there will be an issue, but it still
would be nice to get educated confirmation.
--
Sylvain
- Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #8645] Submission of Freeciv Web Client,
Sylvain Beucler <=