[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah update
From: |
Bradley M. Kuhn |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah update |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:11:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Paul Fisher wrote:
> That's a decision that's not mine to make. At the very least, we will
> provide a secure means for projects to upload files that are GPG signed.
> If projects don't want to use it, we can provide another means for
> uploading files as well.
I strongly believe that any software hosted by FSF for the Free Software
community should be GPG-signed by their authors. We have a concerted
attack on the Free Software infrastructure -- between the cracks on
Debian, FSF, Gentoo and others. We, as leaders in the Free Software
Movement, must instill an ethic of proper autentication for Free Software.
-- bkuhn
--
Learn more about my work for FSF and how you can help:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=bkuhn&p=FSF
pgpNA2iRhfQQD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Savannah-hackers] Re: savannah update, James E. Blair, 2004/01/13
Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah update (signed upload), Vincent Caron, 2004/01/14