2 bugs reports on wiki: should they be on the savannah bug list?

[boud]

hi Dmitry, all,

Since the savannah bug+patch tracking system seems to be working nicely,
i'd like to copy the two bugs listed on:

https://docs.indymedia.org/view/Devel/SamizdatBugs

to savannah, but only if they are still bugs!


> IMPORTANT: textdomain.rb Security Error - Insecure operation - exist?
>     * 0.6.0
>     * gettext-0.8.0-1
>       http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/samizdat-devel/2007-02/msg00002.html
>           o important - since the user sees a crash
>           o less than critical - because reloading the page overrides the bug

i haven't noticed this bug occurring recently.

Is this likely to have been fixed by the MVC refactoring?

Should we list it on savannah or not?


> IMPORTANT: libgettext-ruby-1.7.0 converts latin-1 charsets from UTF-8 to 
> LATIN-1 = ISO-8859-1
>
>     * 0.6.0
>     * libgettext-ruby-1.7.0-1 converts es and fr msgstr's from UTF-8
>       to ISO-8859-1, keeps polish and cyrillic charset's in UTF-8
>           o 
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/samizdat-devel/2007-01/msg00011.html
>           o important - since users don't want to have to manually
>           switch their charset's
>     * seems to be fixed -- BouD - 23 Jun 2007


i don't remember if something specific was done to correct this, but 
libgettext-ruby-1.7.0-1 now seems OK to me. At the moment i don't think
this should be put on savannah.


On the topic of cleaning up bug status levels, for bugs listed on savannah,
i suggest we discuss them on the mailing list before closing any bugs.
Even if usually only 2 people are active, it's probably a good idea to
keep bugs open until we're reasonably confident they're solved.

cheers
boud