Re: Snapshot: 2007-06-17

[boud]

PS: the refactoring of the antispam patch looks nice. i haven't
tested it yet, but it looks nice on a read through.

BTW, what's the general programming principle for the two .freeze
method calls ? Is the idea more to prevent accidental programmer error
(editing the re's could easily create a mess) or rather to protect
against the risk of exploits (since the URL is an external site and
has to be untainted, it could potentially be cracked before anyone
realises that something is wrong - "be suspicious of any external data")?

cheers
boud



On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:

> Today's snapshot includes antispam patch by Boud (a bit refactored),
> fix for #20134 and another similar bug, and updated translations
> (again thanks to Boud). CVS and raw tarball on Savannah updated,
> expect updated package in Debian/experimental in an hour or two.
>
> --
> Dmitry Borodaenko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> samizdat-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/samizdat-devel