Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

[Aaron Wolf]

Just checking in, is there a process to keep track of loose ends like this?

There are proposals like this and the CodeBerg review in progress. How do we keep things progressing so they get completed?

On 2024-01-24 7:24, Richard Stallman wrote:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > "Regarding sending code that runs on the _javascript_ platform, any such 
>   > code used by an important site function either (1) is free software, 
>   > *either* labeled properly for LibreJS 
>   > <https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/> to recognize as free *or with a 
>   > human-verifiable reference that links to relevant source code and 
>   > license files*, or (2) isn't necessary, so that the function works 
>   > properly even if _javascript_ is disabled in the browser.
>
> I think this is a good change.  Does anyone argue against it?
>
> How about if we copy the current C0.0 into level B?
>
>