[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CodeBerg addition
From: |
Fischers Fritz |
Subject: |
Re: CodeBerg addition |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:19:16 +0000 |
Dear associates,
I have begun the review and was pleased with the signup process.
However, I have not received the account yet. Aaron, since you
already have the account, would you like to handle some
of the remaining points? Below are my conclusions so far.
With great honor,
Fischers Fritz
C0: Pass
I registered with w3m.
C1: Pass
I registered with w3m.
C2: Pass
Codeberg bylaws section § 3.1 says.
> Mitglied kann jede natürliche oder juristische Person oder rechtsfähige
> Personengesellschaft werden.
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/Satzung.md
In English this is
> Every natural person, legal person or legal partnership can become a member.
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/en/bylaws.md
C3: TODO
C4: Pass
https://codeberg.org/assets/js/licenses.txt
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/PrivacyPolicy.md
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse.md
C5: Pass
Recommends and encourages GPL 3-or-later licensing at least as much as any
other kind of licensing. (C5)
> Repository content shall be licensed under an open-source license approved
by
> the Free Software Foundation (see list of the FSF) or the Open Source
Initiative
> (see list of the OSI).
> Reasonable exceptions are to a very limited extent considered acceptable.
For
> example, releasing single logo image files of a FLOSS project under no
licence
> or a separate non-free licence that requires derivative works to use their
own
> logo that is clearly distinguishable from the original work even in absence
of
> trademark registration.
C6: TODO
Support HTTPS properly and securely, including the site's certificates. (C6)
B0: TODO
Review https://codeberg.org/assets/js/licenses.txt
and test with LibreJS.
B1: TODO
B2: TODO
Does not encourage bad licensing practices (no license, unclear licensing,
GPL N only). (B2)
B3: Pass
(See C5.)
A0: TODO
Signup worked fine with w3m.
However, I have not received the account, so I have not tested
other functions.
A1: TODO
I think it passes, but I have not checked thoroughly.
A2: Fail
(See C5.)
A3: Pass
(See C5.)
A4: TODO
I believe Codeberg to fail A4, but I am not sure, because I do not understand
the phrase "for practical use". (See C5.) Does somebody know what this means?
A5: Todo
Does not recommend services that are SaaSS. (A5)
A6: FAIL
(See C5.)
A7: TODO
I say pass, but I would like another opinion.
A8: Pass
I didn't notice references to GNU/Linux, GNU, nor Linux.
A9: TODO
A+0: Pass
A+1: TODO
A+2: TODO
A+3: TODO
A+4: TODO
A+5: TODO
Codeberg claims to pass this criterion by being a Forgejo instance.
According to Codeberg, "[b]y choosing a Forgejo instance, you can
easily migrate away from Codeberg in case you don't like it." We can
test the claim by exporting a Codeberg account's data and importing it
to another Forgejo instance.