repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CodeBerg addition


From: Fischers Fritz
Subject: Re: CodeBerg addition
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:19:16 +0000

Dear associates,

I have begun the review and was pleased with the signup process.
However, I have not received the account yet. Aaron, since you
already have the account, would you like to handle some
of the remaining points? Below are my conclusions so far.

With great honor,
Fischers Fritz



C0: Pass

  I registered with w3m.

C1: Pass

  I registered with w3m.

C2: Pass

  Codeberg bylaws section § 3.1 says.

  > Mitglied kann jede natürliche oder juristische Person oder rechtsfähige
  > Personengesellschaft werden.

  https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/Satzung.md

  In English this is

  > Every natural person, legal person or legal partnership can become a member.

  https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/en/bylaws.md

C3: TODO

C4: Pass

  https://codeberg.org/assets/js/licenses.txt
  https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/PrivacyPolicy.md
  https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse.md

C5: Pass

  Recommends and encourages GPL 3-or-later licensing at least as much as any 
other kind of licensing. (C5)

  > Repository content shall be licensed under an open-source license approved 
by
  > the Free Software Foundation (see list of the FSF) or the Open Source 
Initiative
  > (see list of the OSI).
  > Reasonable exceptions are to a very limited extent considered acceptable. 
For
  > example, releasing single logo image files of a FLOSS project under no 
licence
  > or a separate non-free licence that requires derivative works to use their 
own
  > logo that is clearly distinguishable from the original work even in absence 
of
  > trademark registration.

C6: TODO

  Support HTTPS properly and securely, including the site's certificates. (C6)

B0: TODO

  Review https://codeberg.org/assets/js/licenses.txt
  and test with LibreJS.

B1: TODO

B2: TODO

  Does not encourage bad licensing practices (no license, unclear licensing, 
GPL N only). (B2)

B3: Pass

  (See C5.)

A0: TODO

  Signup worked fine with w3m.
  However, I have not received the account, so I have not tested
  other functions.

A1: TODO

  I think it passes, but I have not checked thoroughly.

A2: Fail

  (See C5.)

A3: Pass

  (See C5.)

A4: TODO

  I believe Codeberg to fail A4, but I am not sure, because I do not understand
  the phrase "for practical use". (See C5.) Does somebody know what this means?

A5: Todo
Does not recommend services that are SaaSS. (A5)

A6: FAIL

  (See C5.)

A7: TODO

  I say pass, but I would like another opinion.

A8: Pass

  I didn't notice references to GNU/Linux, GNU, nor Linux.

A9: TODO

A+0: Pass

A+1: TODO

A+2: TODO

A+3: TODO

A+4: TODO

A+5: TODO

  Codeberg claims to pass this criterion by being a Forgejo instance.
  According to Codeberg, "[b]y choosing a Forgejo instance, you can
  easily migrate away from Codeberg in case you don't like it." We can
  test the claim by exporting a Codeberg account's data and importing it
  to another Forgejo instance.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]