Re: Notabug.org should be moved to B tier

[bill-auger]

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 22:08:00 -0400 Richard wrote:
> Could someone please confirm that this is correct:
>     notabug.org has fixed it's problems with javascript. Now 
>     https://notabug.org/js/semantic-2.2.13.min.js isn't used and all 
>     web-labels are up to date. See 
>     https://notabug.org/assets/librejs/librejs.html
> 
> and that notabug has no new problems and deserves a grade of B?

that is not the result i get - librejs blocks two scripts now, instead of one

> blocked scripts in https://notabug.org/NotABug.org/gogs:
> 
> https://notabug.org/plugins/highlight-9.6.0/highlight.pack.js:
> Unknown license(s)
> 
> https://notabug.org/js/semantic-2.2.13.min.js:
> External script with no known license

so the problem with 'semantic-2.2.13.min.js' is the weblabels file, which has
drifted out-of-date - IIRC, that was the original problem in 2021 - the new
problem with 'highlight.pack.js' appears to be a short-coming of librejs - that
file is listed in the weblabels file, and librejs did not reject it in 2021,
IIRC

from the weblabels file:
> semantic-2.2.10.min.js        Expat   semantic-UI-2.2.10.tar.gz
> highlight.pack.js     BSD 3 Clause    highlight.js-9.6.0.tar.gz